<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Second Look at the CRC Form of Subscription Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tiribiv.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/a-second-look-at-the-form-of-subscription-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tiribiv.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/a-second-look-at-the-form-of-subscription-debate/</link>
	<description>The Pursuit of the Nature of Things</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 16:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CRC Synod 2008: Part 1 &#171; tiribiv</title>
		<link>http://tiribiv.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/a-second-look-at-the-form-of-subscription-debate/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>CRC Synod 2008: Part 1 &#171; tiribiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tiribiv.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-65</guid>
		<description>[...] There were a few study committees, as always. The most significant and controversial is the one studying the Form of Subscription, about which I have already written about here and re-examined in light of some overtures. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There were a few study committees, as always. The most significant and controversial is the one studying the Form of Subscription, about which I have already written about here and re-examined in light of some overtures. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
